reproductive animal cloning – репродуктивное клонирование животных
therapeutic cloning – терапевтическое клонирование
organoid research – исследование органоидов
enhanced oversight – усиленный надзор/контроль
low success rate – низкая результативность
blanket ban – всеобщий/полный запрет
hands-on training – практическая подготовка
externship – стажировка вне кампуса
equity of access – равный доступ (к обучению)
phased approach – поэтапный подход
animal welfare safeguards – меры по защите благополучия животных

Student: Honestly, I don’t think a blanket ban is the right move. I’m a pre-vet student, and we’re already short on hands-on training. Reproductive cloning isn’t just “making copies”—it teaches real-world skills in reproductive biology, embryo handling, and welfare monitoring. The memo says we can do externships, but those spots are limited and often cost-prohibitive. That creates an equity problem: students with money and flexible schedules get experience; others get left behind. Also, pointing to a low success rate is exactly why we should improve techniques under strict oversight, not shut them down. If welfare is the concern, set caps on procedures, require veterinary supervision, and publish outcomes. We already use therapeutic cloning and organoids, which are great, but they don’t replace every competency we need. A phased approach with tougher safeguards would protect animals and our education better than an absolute prohibition.

Basic Template:

Reading Main Point: 

- "As stated in the announcement/article/letter…" 

Reasons from Reading: 

- "This is because ___ and ___." 

Transition: 

- "There are two reasons why the woman supports/objects to this …" 

- "The woman has negative feelings about this decision." (for mixed-opinion scenarios). 

First Reason: 

- "To start with, she states that…" 

Second Reason: 

- "In addition, she points out that…" 

Advanced Template:

The announcement/article discusses [the proposed change]. 

This is partly due to [reason 1], as well as [reason 2]. 

The woman promptly voices her support/objection to this change. 

Initially, she claims that [details], elaborating further that [additional details]. 

Moreover, she seems to believe that [details]. From her perspective, [more detailed reasoning].