Step 1. Read the text below. Reading time - 3 minutes
For a growing number of people, the humble plastic bag has become an unnecessary evil that must be stopped.
Discarded carrier bags litter our towns and countryside, they kill wildlife and hang around in the environment for decades.
Landfill operators dislike them for their annoying habit of being blown away from their intended burial site.
The only people who have a good word to say about them are those in the plastic-bag industry.
Big surprise, you might say, but in fact, the industry's arguments do make some sense.
Objectively, plastic bags are nowhere near the world’s worst environmental problem.
The reason they are being picked on, the industry claims, is because they are an easy and emotive target.
Like it or not, the plastic bag has become a part of our lives, and today most people around the world don’t use anything else to carry their shopping in.
Depending on who is asked, the UK gets through somewhere between 9 billion and 17 billion plastic bags a year.
Globally, we carry home between 500 billion and a trillion annually, which is 150 bags a year for every single person on Earth, or, to put it another way, a million a minute and rising.
Shocking as these statistics are, they don’t explain why plastic bags have become so hated.
Given that there are far more voracious uses of fossil fuels than the production of high-density polyethylene used to make the bags, the argument is possibly more about aesthetics than wasting resources.
After they have been carried home, bags may be re-used once, but most end up at landfill sites.
A proportion will try to escape somewhere along the way, blustering around the streets or flapping annoyingly in trees.
This irritating habit has earned them a variety of nicknames around the world, such as ‘white pollution’ in China, and the ‘national flower’ in South Africa.
Plastic bags can also have a devastating effect on sea creatures.
There have been a number of cases recently where they have been ingested by turtles and whales, leading to internal obstruction and death.
The Planet Ark Environmental Foundation in Sydney, Australia, estimates that tens of thousands of whales, seals, turtles, and birds are killed every year from plastic bag litter, far out at sea.
Yet at the seaside, plastic bags make up only a tiny proportion of actual litter, with plastic bottles featuring higher in the list.
According to the Carrier Bag Consortium, a group of UK suppliers which was set up in 2002 to fight the anti-bag campaign, measures like the Irish bag tax have done nothing to reduce the consumption or solve the problem of disposal of plastic bags.
The Consortium likes to point out that plastic bags have among the highest re-use rates of any disposable product and, what is more, they are more energy-efficient to manufacture and transport than bulkier, heavier alternatives like paper or cardboard.
Unsurprisingly, the industry takes issue with being blamed for general environmental irresponsibility.
So if plastic bags aren't as bad as they are made out to be, are governments and green campaigners jumping on the wrong bandwagon?
Well, yes and no.
While the plastic carrier may have been made a scapegoat, it is also true that if you want people to think about sustainability, an everyday object that most of them already feel guilty about is a good place to start.
Governments have realised that by focusing on something so symbolic, they can get messages across to people about their behaviour and how the environment is and will continue to be affected by it, unless we all undertake some lifestyle changes.
Take screenshots of your answers checked with the check button and send for a check.If you have too many wrong answers, click 'try again' , do the exercise again and only then send for a check.
1.2. Complete the sentences below with words taken from the reading passage.
Use NO MORE THAN TWO WORDS for each answer.
The writer states that plastic bags can be deadly to .
Plastic bags are unpopular with those dealing with waste management because they have a tendency to .
The writer suggests that apart from environmental concerns, another reason for disliking plastic bags may be based on .
Plastic bags have caused fatal in some sea creatures.
According to the writer, are a more serious litter problem on beaches.
The Carrier Bag Consortium claims that the Irish bag tax has not achieved a cut in the of bags.
Nor has the Irish bag tax helped the of plastic bags.
The writer believes that the plastic bag has become of a way of life that is unsustainable.
Total Questions: 0
Incorrect Answers: 0
1.3. Prepare an oral analytical summary of the article above. Use such guidelines:
The text examines the ongoing debate surrounding... highlighting the reasons behind ... vilification
-While ... have increasingly targeted... as ..., the plastic-bag industry argues that .....
-On the surface, ...disputes the idea that...
-However, the article presents counterarguments suggesting that...overstated.
-Compared to .... , bags account for ....
-Proponents of plastic bags emphasize their...
-Ultimately, the article suggests that... a useful tool for raising awareness about...
-The question remains, however, whether such measures address the root causes of environmental degradation or merely serve as a convenient campaign.
Step 4. Write out the three main ideas and their elaborations/illustrations/ details that the lecturer provides. When you hear the question, click to show the passage and question and begin your response. Writing time - 40 minutes. Write at least 250 words.
Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they oppose and how they complement some specific points made in the reading passage. Write at least 250 words.
TOEFL Integrated Writing Template: Summarizing and Contrasting Lecture and Reading
Introduction
The lecture challenges/supports/expands on the points made in the reading by arguing that…
While the reading passage presents the idea that…, the lecturer offers a different/more nuanced perspective by…
The lecturer both opposes and complements certain claims made in the reading, particularly regarding…
Body Paragraph 1 – Opposing Points (Use to highlight contradictions between the lecture and reading)
First, the lecturer contradicts the reading’s claim that…
While the reading suggests that…, the speaker argues otherwise by stating that…
According to the lecturer, this argument is flawed because…
For instance, the lecture provides evidence that…
This directly challenges the passage’s statement that…
Body Paragraph 2 – Additional Contradictions or Expansions (Further differences, adding more complexity to the opposition)
Another point of disagreement is that the reading argues…, whereas the lecturer maintains that…
The lecture refutes this idea by explaining that…
Moreover, the lecturer highlights… which contradicts the reading’s suggestion that…
This casts doubt on the validity of the passage’s claim that…
Body Paragraph 3 – Complementary Points (Where the lecture and reading align or reinforce each other)
Despite these differences, the lecturer does acknowledge that…
Interestingly, the lecture complements the passage in that both sources agree on…
Although the lecturer disputes some aspects of the reading, they also emphasize that…
This suggests that, while there are points of contention, both perspectives recognize…
Conclusion
In summary, while the lecture refutes some of the reading’s claims by arguing that…, it also reinforces the idea that…
Ultimately, the speaker provides a more detailed analysis, countering certain points but also highlighting the importance of…
Therefore, the lecture presents both opposing and supporting perspectives on the issue discussed in the reading.
II. Speaking
1. Speaking 1. Using the template below, prepare answers to each of the following questions separately.
a. In your opinion, should governments invest in campaigns about recycling plastic bags? Include details and examples to support your explanation.
b. Given non-plastic packaging is less energy-efficient, should plastic packaging be prioritized? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
c. Today, recycling technologies are being developed across the globe. How do you try to contribute to the trend? Include details and examples to support your explanation.
Step 1. Read the text below - a short (about 100 words) article on an academic topic. Reading time - 45 sec. It defines the term and gives some basic details. In the exam you can only see it one time.
Plastic bags have become a scapegoat for environmental pollution, despite being only a small fraction of overall waste. While they are highly visible and often blamed for ecological harm, other plastic products, such as bottles and packaging, contribute far more to pollution. Governments and activists focus on banning plastic bags because they are an easy target, rather than addressing larger, more complex environmental issues. Studies show that plastic bags have a lower carbon footprint than paper or cotton alternatives, yet they are unfairly demonized. Instead of singling them out, efforts should be directed toward comprehensive waste management and sustainable production.
Step 2. Listen to a short lecture (1-2 minutes) about the same topic. The lecture will explain the topic using one or two examples.
Step 4. Prepare an answer to the following question: Explain how plastic bags have a smaller carbon footprint than paper and cardboard, using the examples given in the lecture.
You are given 30 seconds to prepare, and 60 seconds to speak.