Mutual Investment Funds (MIFs): Classifications, Securities, Regulation & Global Comparison
What is a Mutual Investment Fund?
A mutual investment fund is a pool of funds collected from many investors for the purpose of investing in securities such as stocks, bonds, and other financial assets. They provide diversification, professional management, and are accessible to retail and institutional investors alike.
Classifications of MIFs
Type |
Description |
Open-End Funds |
Units can be bought and redeemed at any time at NAV. |
Closed-End Funds |
Fixed capital; units traded on exchanges like stocks. |
Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) |
Traded on exchanges with fluctuating market prices. |
Index Funds |
Track a specific market index (e.g., S&P 500). |
Actively Managed Funds |
Managed by professionals aiming to outperform the market. |
Bond Funds |
Invest in various bonds including corporate and government. |
Equity Funds |
Primarily invest in stocks. |
Mixed/Hybrid Funds |
Blend of equities, bonds, and other asset classes. |
Securities Related to MIFs
- Units or Shares: Ownership in the fund.
- Underlying Assets: Stocks, bonds, derivatives, money market instruments.
- NAV (Net Asset Value): Price per unit/share calculated from the portfolio value.
Regulation and Governance
Element |
Description |
Fund Manager |
Responsible for asset allocation and performance. |
Custodian |
Holds fund assets securely. |
Regulatory Body |
Oversees legal compliance and investor protection. |
Disclosure Requirements |
Includes NAV updates, portfolio holdings, and fund prospectus. |
Comparison of MIFs by Country
Criteria |
Russia |
Ukraine |
USA |
Argentina |
China |
Regulator |
Bank of Russia |
NSSMC |
SEC |
CNV |
CSRC |
Common Types |
OIF, UIF, ETFs |
Corporate, venture, unit funds |
Open-end, ETFs |
Open-end, ETFs |
Public/private, QDII |
Legal Basis |
Federal Law 156-FZ |
Law on Collective Investment |
1940 Investment Act |
Law 24.083 |
Securities Investment Fund Law |
Market Maturity |
Developing |
Emerging |
Developed |
Emerging |
Rapidly developing |
Foreign Access |
Limited |
Limited |
Full |
Partially restricted |
Via QFII or Stock Connect |
NAV Disclosure |
Weekly |
Quarterly |
Daily |
Weekly |
Daily |
Taxation |
13% capital gains |
18% + levy |
Varies |
5–15% |
Taxed unless exempt |
Case Study: National Flagship Funds Comparison
Feature |
Sberbank OIF (Russia) |
Vanguard 500 Index Fund (USA) |
CSI 300 Index Fund (China) |
FIMA Capital Plus (Argentina) |
Fund Type |
Balanced OIF |
Index fund |
Index ETF |
Open-end capital preservation |
Main Assets |
Russian equities and bonds |
S&P 500 stocks |
CSI 300 stocks |
Short-term bonds |
Manager |
Sberbank AM |
Vanguard |
E Fund/Harvest |
Banco Galicia |
Currency |
RUB |
USD |
CNY |
ARS |
Expense Ratio |
~1.5% |
0.04% |
0.5%–1% |
~2%–3% |
Minimum Investment |
₽1000 |
$3000 |
¥100 |
ARS 1000 |
Performance (5 yrs) |
~+30% RUB |
~+80% USD |
~+35% CNY |
~+25% ARS nominal |
Risk Profile |
Medium-high |
Medium |
Medium-high |
Low (high inflation risk) |
Foreign Access |
Restricted |
Fully open |
Limited (Stock Connect) |
Generally closed |
Conclusion: While mutual funds serve a similar function globally, their structure, regulation, accessibility, and return profiles vary significantly. US funds offer the most efficient and transparent investment options, while emerging markets like Russia and Argentina offer higher risk and limited access for foreign investors.
Prepare analysis of the central bank's review of Russian management companies in 2025 Q1