Response 2.1
I support the view that having a wide variety of choices positively impacts decision-making.
I hold this opinion for several reasons.
To begin with, if you have many choices, you can progress more. For instance, I had high exam score [k4: article mistake] a high final exam score, so I could go to many [k3: unnatural collocation] enter many well-regarded universities that met my requirements. I chose the best of them for me [k3: redundancy] them.
If I did not have [k4: wrong tense in conditional] hadn't had such a wide choice, I would probably study in worse university [k4: article mistake] have entered a worse university and progress in my profession less [k5: unnatural word order] progressed less in my profession.
Additionally, having large number [k4: article mistake] a large number of options just makes our live [k5: spelling mistake] life happier. To elaborate, in any choice [k3: unnatural phrasing] when making a choice, you can select variant [k4: article mistake] the variant that will be the most comfortable for you and by that just [k3: wordiness] thus increase your happiness.
Response 2.2
Personally, I firmly believe that that [k5: repetition] having wide variety [k4: article mistake] a wide variety of choices leads to innovation and progress.
This is mainly due to large number [k4: article mistake] a large number of options leading to competition and it leading [k5: unclear reference] the latter leading to progress. By this, I mean that if people have many choices in one type of product, they will choose the most profitable for them [k3: unnatural phrasing] beneficial option.
Response 3
As stated in the announcement, institute [k4: missing article] the institute created 20 new extracurricular courses and suggests students to go on them [k4: unnatural phrasing, study these rules] suggests that students take them.
This is because the courses will give students skills to be better at // to excel in their profession and be more valuable in job market [k4: missing article] the job market.
There are two reasons why the man objects to this decision.
To start with, he states that students do not have much free time to do all this courses [k4: this/these agreement] all these courses, so they have to choose which they want and it will be //, which will be very tough [k1: style too informal] too troublesome //challenging.
In addition, he points that [k3: incorrect phrase] points out that it would be better if university [k4: missing article] the university focus [k4: verb tense] focused on teaching students main professional courses [k3: unnatural term] their major disciplines // core academic subjects/degree-related subjects rather than adding extra options.
Response 4.TOEFL Integrated Writing_Plastic Bags
The lecturer both opposes and complements certain claims made in the reading, particularly regarding affect [k4: article] the effect that plastic bags make [k4: incorrect verb ] have on the environment, do banes and charges help to decrease this affect [k2: incorrect sentence structure] whether bans and charges effectively reduce this impact, what arguments to defend plastic bags and are they true [k2: incorrect phrasing] and the validity of arguments in favor of plastic bags.
First, the lecturer contradicts the reading’s claim that plastic bags do not affect much on [k4: incorrect verb structure] have much impact on our planet. While the reading suggests that they are just a scapegoat made by governments and companies, the speaker argues otherwise by stating that big amount of litter [k4: incorrect quantifier] a large amount of litter that floats in the sea consists of plastic bags. many turtles killed by eating plastic and other animals die because of these bags too. [k2: incomplete sentence – should be restructured] Many turtles die after ingesting plastic, and other animals are also fatally affected by plastic bags.
Another point of disagreement // contention is the efficiency of bans and charges: that [k2: wordiness, restructure the sentence] the reading argues that bans and charges directed to this product [k4: incorrect preposition+k2:excessive words] on plastic bags they do not work, whereas the lecturer maintains that they do. The lecture refutes this idea by explaining that, for example, Denmark has one of the lowest usage rates of plastic, because of some banes [k5] and charges directed to plastic bags that their government made. [k5: awkward sentence structure] Denmark has one of the lowest plastic bag usage rates due to government-imposed bans and charges.
Despite these differences, the lecturer does acknowledge that there are some arguments in favor of plastic bags. Interestingly, the lecture complements the passage in that both sources agree on high reusability of them [k4: incorrect phrase] their high reusability. Although the lecturer emphasizes some aspects of the reading, she also disputes that after final use they lay on the ground for years and decompose very slow. [k4: incorrect verb + incorrect adverb form] after their final use, they remain in the environment for years and decompose very slowly.
Ultimately, the speaker provides a more detailed analysis, countering certain points but also highlighting the importance of symbol to fight pollution that plastic bags became. [k2: incorrect sentence structure - incoherence] the symbolic role plastic bags have come to play in the fight against pollution.