Who Really Created MS-DOS? | Interactive English Lesson

Interactive case file 01

Who really created MS-DOS?

Bill Gates made the decisive business move, but he did not write the original operating system. Trace the route from CP/M to QDOS, PC DOS and MS-DOS while practising listening, technology vocabulary and participial constructions.

c. 1974

Gary Kildall → CP/M

Kildall wrote CP/M, the dominant operating system for many early microcomputers.

1980

Tim Paterson → QDOS

Paterson wrote QDOS—later renamed 86-DOS—for Seattle Computer Products.

1981

Microsoft + IBM → PC DOS

Microsoft acquired 86-DOS, adapted it for IBM and licensed related versions as MS-DOS.

01

Listening // gap fill

Reconstruct the documentary excerpt

Watch from approximately 19:58. Use every word from the bank once. The transcript has been lightly edited for punctuation and name accuracy while retaining the speakers’ wording.

Presenter
This is the moment Digital Research—headed by Gary Kildall, the creator of CP/M—dropped the . IBM, distinctly unimpressed with its reception, went back to Microsoft. Bill Gates is not the man to give a a second chance. He saw the opportunity of a lifetime.

Bill Gates
“Digital Research didn’t that, and we knew it was essential. If somebody didn’t do it, the project was going to fall .”

Microsoft executive
“So we just got carried away and said, ‘Look, we can’t afford to lose the language business!’ That was the thought. We can’t afford to have IBM not go forward. This is the most exciting thing that’s going to happen in PCs!”

Bill Gates
“And we were already out on the because we had licensed them not only BASIC but Fortran, COBOL, Assembler, Typing Tutor and Adventure. Basically, every product the company had, we had committed to do for IBM in a very short time frame.”

Presenter
But there was a problem. IBM needed an operating system fast, and Microsoft didn’t have one. What it did have was a of luck—the ingredient everyone needs to be a billionaire.

Presenter
Unbelievably, the solution was just across town. Paul Allen—Gates’s programming partner since high school—had found another operating system.

Paul Allen
“There was a local company in Seattle called Seattle Computer Products. A guy named Tim Paterson had done an operating system—a very rudimentary operating system that was kind of like CP/M.”

Microsoft representative
“We just told IBM, ‘Look, we’ll get this operating system from the small local company. We’ll take care of it, we’ll it up, and you can still do a PC.’”

Presenter
Tim Paterson’s operating system, which saved the deal with IBM, was, well, adapted from Gary Kildall’s CP/M.

Tim Paterson
“I took a CP/M manual that I’d bought from a retail computer store for $5 in 1976, or something, and used that as the basis for the application programming interface—the API—for my operating system. Using ideas that came from different places, I started in April, and it was about -time for four months before I had my first working version.”

Presenter
This is it: the operating system Tim Paterson wrote. He called it QDOS, the “quick and dirty operating system.” Microsoft and IBM called it PC DOS 1.0. Under any name, it looks an awful lot like CP/M. On this computer, I have PC DOS and CP/M-86 running. Frankly, it is very hard to the difference between them: the command structures are the same, and so are the directories. In fact, the only obvious external difference is that the floppy drive is labelled A in PC DOS and C in CP/M. Some difference—and yet one generated billions in revenue, while the other .

Presenter
As usual in the PC business, the prize did not go to the inventor but to the exploiter of the invention. In this case, that was not Gary Kildall; it was not even Tim Paterson.

Presenter
There was still one problem. Tim Paterson worked for Seattle Computer Products, or SCP. It still owned the rights to QDOS—rights that Microsoft had to have.

Vern Raburn
“We went back and said to them, ‘Look, we want to buy this thing.’ SCP was like most little companies: it always needed , and so that was when it entered the negotiation.”

Paul Allen
“We ended up working out an agreement to buy the operating system for whatever usage we wanted for $50,000.”

Presenter
Let’s pause there to savour a historic moment: “For whatever usage we wanted for $50,000.” It had to be the of the century, if not the millennium. It certainly was. The agreement made Bill Gates and Paul Allen multibillionaires.

02

Vocabulary // retrieval

Find the expression in the transcript

Use the form that appears in the text. Small variations such as including or omitting to are accepted.

#MeaningExpression
01to make an important mistake or fail to act
02a unique chance that may never come again
03to grant somebody the legal right to use something
04to promise or bind yourself to do something
05in an exposed or risky position, without much support
06a sudden piece of good fortune
07to repair, adjust or improve something
08to enjoy or appreciate something slowly and fully
03

Comprehension // synthesis

Answer in your own words

Do not copy whole sentences from the transcript. Compare your response with the concise model only after you have written your own.

01Who created CP/M?

Model answer

Gary Kildall wrote CP/M and founded Digital Research, the company that marketed it.

02Who created QDOS?

Model answer

Tim Paterson wrote QDOS for Seattle Computer Products. It was later renamed 86-DOS.

03How were CP/M and QDOS similar, and how were they different?

Model answer

QDOS imitated CP/M’s user-visible interface and commands, which made programs easier to port, but it was written for the 16-bit Intel 8086 family and had different internal code.

04Who adapted 86-DOS for the IBM PC?

Model answer

Microsoft adapted the system for IBM, with Tim Paterson working closely with Microsoft and IBM engineers.

05How did PC DOS and MS-DOS emerge from QDOS?

Model answer

Microsoft first licensed and later purchased 86-DOS, adapted it for IBM as PC DOS, and licensed related versions to other computer makers as MS-DOS.

06Which software had Microsoft already promised to IBM?

Model answer

It had committed to supply BASIC, Fortran, COBOL, Assembler, Typing Tutor, Adventure and essentially every suitable product it had.

07Why was Microsoft under pressure to find an operating system?

Model answer

IBM needed an operating system quickly, while Microsoft wanted the IBM PC project to proceed and had already committed other software to it.

08Where did Microsoft obtain the operating system?

Model answer

It obtained 86-DOS from Seattle Computer Products, a small company located near Microsoft.

09According to the documentary, who “dropped the ball”?

Model answer

The documentary says Digital Research missed the opportunity after failing to reach an agreement with IBM.

10Why did the $50,000 purchase become so valuable?

Model answer

Microsoft acquired broad rights to the system and could license it to many manufacturers, so each new PC could generate revenue.

11Who benefited most financially from the deal?

Model answer

Microsoft benefited most; the agreement helped make Bill Gates and Paul Allen extremely wealthy.

04

Grammar lab // Participle I

Build accurate participial clauses

Rewrite each pair as one sentence. Check that the understood subject of the participial clause is logical and that the sequence of events is clear.

Same subjectWanting to secure the deal, Gates acted quickly.
Earlier completed actionHaving found QDOS, Allen contacted IBM.
Different subjects: absolute clauseDigital Research having failed to reach an agreement, IBM returned to Microsoft.
Negative formNot being willing to wait, IBM pursued another option.
Grammar check: without + -ing is traditionally analysed as a gerundial phrase. To practise a genuine absolute participial construction, this lesson uses patterns such as with nobody seizing … or the opportunity not being seized ….

Example A
Bill Gates was not the sort of man to give a rival a second chance. He decided to secure the agreement with IBM at all costs.
→ Not being the sort of man to give a rival a second chance, Bill Gates decided to secure the agreement with IBM at all costs.

Example B
Digital Research dropped the ball. The situation then turned in Bill Gates’s favour.
→ Digital Research having dropped the ball, the situation turned in Bill Gates’s favour.

Digital Research failed to give IBM a warm reception. IBM turned back to Microsoft.

Suggested transformation

Digital Research having failed to give IBM a warm reception, IBM turned back to Microsoft. This is a perfect absolute construction: the two clauses have different subjects, and the failure came first.

If nobody else seized the opportunity, the project would fall apart. Begin with With …

Suggested transformation

With nobody else seizing the opportunity, the project would fall apart. The noun phrase nobody else is the explicit subject of seizing.

Microsoft had a keen interest in the IBM PC project but faced severe time constraints. It decided to buy a ready-made operating system.

Suggested transformation

Having a keen interest in the IBM PC project but facing severe time constraints, Microsoft decided to buy a ready-made operating system. Both participles share the subject Microsoft.

Bill Gates wanted to provide IBM with a comprehensive software package. He therefore moved quickly to acquire an operating system.

Suggested transformation

Wanting to provide IBM with a comprehensive software package, Bill Gates moved quickly to acquire an operating system.

Seattle Computer Products was cash-strapped. It accepted Microsoft’s offer of $50,000.

Suggested transformation

Being cash-strapped, Seattle Computer Products accepted Microsoft’s offer of $50,000.

05

Grammar lab // -ing postmodifiers

Reduce active relative clauses with an -ing clause

Use an -ing clause when its understood subject is the noun it follows and the action is ongoing or characteristic. Restrictive reductions act as postmodifiers; comma-separated reductions are supplementary clauses. One sentence cannot be reduced without losing its earlier-time meaning. Identify it.

Example
Of the three people who were dealing with the operating-system question, Bill Gates proved the most commercially astute.
→ Of the three people dealing with the operating-system question, Bill Gates proved the most commercially astute.

Use limit: an attributive present participle normally describes an active, ongoing or characteristic relationship. A past-perfect relative clause such as who had developed … marks a completed earlier action. Having developed … can express that meaning, but it functions as a perfect supplementary participial clause—not as an attributive present-participial postmodifier.

The programmer who was working for Seattle Computer Products developed QDOS.

Suggested transformation

The programmer working for Seattle Computer Products developed QDOS. The restrictive -ing clause identifies which programmer is meant.

The Microsoft executives who were negotiating with IBM recognised how urgently the project needed an operating system.

Suggested transformation

The Microsoft executives negotiating with IBM recognised how urgently the project needed an operating system.

The two operating systems that are running on the presenter’s computer are difficult to tell apart.

Suggested transformation

The two operating systems running on the presenter’s computer are difficult to tell apart.

The prize, which amounted to billions of dollars, went not to either inventor but to the company exploiting the invention.

Suggested transformation

The prize, amounting to billions of dollars, went not to either inventor but to the company exploiting the invention.

Find the exception

Tim Paterson, who had developed an operating system resembling CP/M, lived just across town.

Why this is the exception

Keep the finite relative clause if you need to preserve the completed earlier action. Tim Paterson, having developed an operating system resembling CP/M, lived just across town is grammatical, but having developed … is a perfect supplementary participial clause, not an attributive present-participial postmodifier.

The company that controlled the rights to QDOS ultimately sold them to Microsoft for $50,000.

Suggested transformation

The company controlling the rights to QDOS ultimately sold them to Microsoft for $50,000.

06

Speaking // perspective shift

Retell the story from three viewpoints

Speak for 60–90 seconds in each role. Use at least four prompts from the card and include one participial construction.

Viewpoint 01

Gary Kildall

  • to sue somebody for copyright infringement
  • a ruthless operator
  • to cash in on somebody’s hard work
  • Microsoft having acquired 86-DOS, …
Register: The original phrase a ruthless bastard is strongly offensive. Use it only when deliberately portraying anger in informal speech.
Viewpoint 02

Tim Paterson

  • Had we not been cash-strapped, …
  • I wish I hadn’t sold / underestimated …
  • to underestimate the potential of something
  • a cutthroat business
  • to sue somebody
  • to be taken for a sucker
Viewpoint 03

Paul Allen

  • to confide in somebody
  • to spot the opportunity of a lifetime
  • to be dead set on seizing an opportunity
  • to make it big
  • a business coup
  • to go for broke / to be out on a limb
  • It is terrifying to think what might have happened if …
  • Supposing we had dropped the ball, what would have happened?
Interactive English lesson // technology history, vocabulary and participial constructions