III. Speaking — Extra Practice
1. Independent Speaking_1
Do you agree or disagree: “Young adults should have an annual comprehensive medical checkup even if they feel healthy.”
Preparation time - 15 seconds, speaking time - 45 seconds.
Click here to show/hide active words
preventive care – профилактическое медицинское обслуживание
early detection – раннее выявление
silent conditions – «тихие» заболевания
long-term health outcomes – долгосрочные показатели здоровья
cost-effective – экономически эффективный
peace of mind – спокойствие, уверенность
overdiagnosis – избыточная диагностика
healthcare burden – нагрузка на систему здравоохранения
Click here to show/hide verbal phrases & grammar
To begin with … (infinitive of purpose)
Identifying conditions early can help … (gerund as subject)
Having annual checkups allows people to … (gerund phrase)
Only by attending regular checkups can one … (inversion)
Being reassured by a doctor contributes to … (participle phrase)
Click here to show/hide model answer
Model Answer: I strongly agree that annual checkups are essential for young adults. To begin with, identifying silent conditions early can help prevent serious illness later on. For example, routine blood tests allow physicians to detect high cholesterol before it damages the heart.
Furthermore, being proactive with one’s health is cost-effective. Only by attending regular checkups can one avoid expensive treatments in the future and reduce the healthcare burden.
Admittedly, some worry about overdiagnosis, but the benefits outweigh the drawbacks. Being reassured by a doctor provides peace of mind, which supports both physical and mental well-being.
2. Independent Speaking_2
Universities debate adding mandatory mental-health screening for first-year students. Would you support this policy?
Preparation time - 15 seconds, speaking time - 45 seconds.
Click here to show/hide active words
early intervention – раннее вмешательство
stigma reduction – снижение стигматизации
psychological well-being – психологическое благополучие
counseling services – консультативные службы
academic performance – успеваемость
stress management – управление стрессом
privacy concerns – проблемы конфиденциальности
support network – сеть поддержки
Click here to show/hide verbal phrases & grammar
Introducing mandatory screenings helps to … (infinitive of purpose)
Normalizing participation reduces stigma … (gerund as subject)
To be effective, screenings must remain confidential … (infinitive as adverbial)
Not only does early intervention …, but it also … (inversion)
Being able to access support services encourages students to … (participle phrase)
Click here to show/hide model answer
Model Answer: I would support mandatory mental-health screening for first-year students. Not only does early intervention prevent crises, but it also promotes academic success by connecting struggling students with counseling services before problems escalate.
Moreover, normalizing participation reduces stigma. When everyone is screened, students feel it is natural to seek help. To be effective, screenings must remain confidential, but with safeguards the benefits outweigh the risks.
Ultimately, being able to access support services encourages students to manage stress constructively, strengthening both their well-being and their academic performance.
3. Independent Speaking_3
Hospitals are adopting AI tools to read X-rays and lab results. Should doctors rely on AI as a second opinion for most tests?
Preparation time - 15 seconds, speaking time - 45 seconds.
Click here to show/hide active words
diagnostic accuracy – точность диагностики
second opinion – второе мнение
efficiency – эффективность
human oversight – человеческий контроль
bias in algorithms – предвзятость алгоритмов
clinical judgment – клиническое суждение
error reduction – снижение ошибок
patient trust – доверие пациентов
Click here to show/hide verbal phrases & grammar
To improve accuracy, doctors should combine AI with judgment … (infinitive of purpose)
Using AI as a second opinion reduces errors … (gerund as subject)
Relying exclusively on AI could lead to … (gerund phrase)
Never before has technology offered … (inversion)
Having algorithms analyze patterns allows physicians to … (participle phrase)
Click here to show/hide model answer
Model Answer: I support using AI as a second opinion in diagnostics. Never before has technology offered such speed and accuracy in reading medical images. Using algorithms reduces error and allows physicians to decide more confidently.
Having algorithms analyze thousands of cases enables doctors to focus on complex patients, increasing efficiency and preserving time for communication. Relying exclusively on AI, however, could lead to mistakes.
To improve accuracy, doctors should combine AI with their own clinical judgment. This balance not only reduces errors but also strengthens patient trust.
3. Integrated Speaking_2
Active vocab
Click here to show/hide active words
mandatory check-up — обязательный медосмотр
incentive / perk — поощрение / привилегия
out-of-pocket cost — личные расходы
data privacy — конфиденциальность данных
medical certificate — медицинская справка/сертификат
waiver — освобождение (от требования)
liability — юридическая ответственность
coercive / intrusive — принудительный / навязчивый
early detection — раннее выявление
campus clinic — университетская поликлиника
Step 1. Read the announcement
From: Office of Student Life
Date: September 5, 2025
The University is launching a Preventive Health Initiative. All first-year undergraduates are encouraged to complete a comprehensive health check-up at the campus clinic before the end of the semester.
Students who participate will receive priority access to fitness facilities and a 10% discount on campus dining plans. The package includes cholesterol and lipoprotein(a) screening, vision and hearing tests, and a confidential mental-health evaluation. Students may request a waiver with equivalent documentation from a certified physician dated within the last 6 months.
Step 2. Listen to the audio file below. During the real exam you will hear the audio only once. But now you can listen to it as many times as you want.
If you have difficulty understanding the audio,
Click here to read the script
Student (indignant): Honestly, I find this new so-called “Preventive Health Initiative” completely unfair. The university says it’s voluntary, but it clearly pressures students by offering perks like gym priority and meal plan discounts. That basically penalizes anyone who doesn’t want—or can’t afford—to undergo additional medical tests. Some of us already have regular doctors at home—why should we pay again just to prove we’re healthy enough to access basic facilities on campus? And it feels like an invasion of privacy. Why should the university collect cholesterol and mental-health data about students at all? Education should be about learning, not about forcing us into medical check-ups disguised as incentives. To me, this policy is coercive, intrusive, and a misuse of student funds.
Step 3. Prepare and record (in a messenger) an answer to the following question.
Preparation time - 30 seconds, speaking time - 60 seconds.
The student expresses her opinion of the university’s announcement. State her opinion and the reasons she gives for holding that opinion.
Click here to show/hide useful introductory expressions
Basic Introductory Expressions:
- "As stated in the announcement, …"
- "The student agrees / objects to this policy because …"
- "To start with, …"
- "In addition, …"
Advanced Introductory Expressions:
- "The announcement discusses …"
- "The student promptly voices her support / opposition …"
- "Initially, she claims that …"
- "Moreover, she emphasizes …"
Click here to show/hide model answers
Basic Template:
Reading Main Point: “As stated in the announcement, the university encourages health check-ups with incentives.”
Transition: “The student objects to this policy for two main reasons.”
First Reason: “To start with, she argues the incentives are coercive and create financial pressure.”
Second Reason: “In addition, she raises privacy concerns about the university holding health data.”
Advanced Template:
The announcement promotes voluntary check-ups with perks. The student strongly opposes the policy, claiming it is coercive (because perks penalize non-participants) and intrusive (due to data-privacy concerns). Summarize both reasons and connect them clearly to the announcement.
Integrated speaking_3
Step1. Read the text
Reading time: 45 seconds
Why Genetic Wellness Scores Deserve Attention
Recent advances in diagnostics have produced novel blood tests that go beyond finding a single disease. Some clinics now combine multiple markers into an embryo’s genetic wellness score, estimating future risk for complex conditions such as diabetes or heart disease and, controversially, non-medical traits. Supporters claim these tools let families make more informed reproductive choices. For example, if several embryos are available through IVF, picking the one with the highest wellness score could, in theory, reduce lifetime health risks and healthcare costs. In addition, early knowledge of predispositions might motivate parents to adopt preventive measures long before any symptoms appear. Advocates conclude that such testing shifts medicine toward a more predictive and preventive model.
Click here to show/hide active words
novel blood test — новый тип анализа крови
genetic wellness score — генетический «индекс здоровья» эмбриона
predictive / preventive medicine — предиктивная / профилактическая медицина
polygenic trait — полигенный признак
informed reproductive choice — осознанный репродуктивный выбор
selection among embryos — выбор между эмбрионами
ethical concern — этическая проблема
risk stratification — стратификация риска
Step 2. Listen to the lecture
Note: Prepare a sheet of paper and a pen/pencil. Take notes of illustrations of the ideas given in the reading!
Hard to understand? Click here to show/hide the script of the lecture.
Professor (challenging): The promise of embryo “wellness scores” rests on assumptions that are scientifically fragile. First, most of the outcomes being predicted—chronic disease and especially complex traits—are strongly shaped by environment. Polygenic scores built from adult populations don’t transfer perfectly to embryos or across ancestries, so parents may form false expectations.
Second, the ethics are not incidental. Ranking embryos by a composite score pushes society toward trait preference, which can narrow diversity and privilege families who can afford testing. That raises fairness concerns and risks stigmatizing lower-scoring children who may be perfectly healthy.
Third, information can backfire. Learning about “elevated risk” very early often increases parental anxiety and can lead to over-medicalizing childhood, even when the absolute risk is modest. So, while predictive blood tests sound innovative, their limited validity and social costs make widespread use premature.
Using points and examples from the lecture, explain how the professor challenges the claims made in the reading. Link each lecture point to the specific idea it casts doubt on.
Step 3. Prepare and record your answer (send in a messenger)
Preparation time: 30 seconds
Answer time: 60 seconds
Speaking Time: 60 seconds
Show/hide template and prompts
Question Three Template (General to Specific)
Basic Template:
- Stating the Term or Idea — “The reading is about genetic wellness scores from novel blood tests.”
- Give a Small Amount of Detail — “It claims selecting the highest-scoring embryo makes medicine more predictive and preventive.”
- Transition — “The professor disputes these claims and explains why.”
- Lecture Point 1 → Reading Claim — “He says polygenic prediction is limited and environment matters, which undermines the selection argument.”
- Lecture Point 2 → Reading Claim — “He raises equity/ethics (trait preference, stigma), challenging the ‘benefit’ framing.”
- Lecture Point 3 → Reading Claim — “He warns about anxiety and over-medicalization, casting doubt on net benefits.”
Advanced Template (Introductory Expressions):
“The passage argues that …”; “By contrast, the professor maintains that …”; “To begin with, he contends … which contradicts …”; “Furthermore, he emphasizes … thereby challenging …”; “Finally, he cautions that … which weakens the claim that …”; “In sum, the lecture systematically undermines the reading by …”
Integrated speaking_4
As of 2025 there is no longer any reading passage in this speaking task.
Focus on defining the concept, then presenting the examples or perspectives given by the lecturer.
Step 1.
Note: Take notes of illustrations/examples in the lecture!
Show/hide the lecture script
Click to show/hide Active Words (EN → RU)
Click to see the question
Step 3. Prepare and record your answer
Preparation time: 30 seconds
Answer time: 60 seconds
Speaking Time: 60 seconds
Difference between Speaking 3 and 4
Task |
Structure |
Content |
Preparation time |
Lecture Purpose |
|
Speaking 3 (new format)
|
Short reading + Professor lecture |
Concept/claim + two main ideas |
30 sec |
Supports/elaborates or casts doubt |
|
Speaking 4
|
Reading removed + more complex lecture |
Concept + 2–3 deeper examples |
20 sec |
Illustrates and elaborates |
To part 1